Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCT5 - Crafty perspective

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:35:50 01/21/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 21, 2003 at 09:17:36, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>On January 21, 2003 at 09:09:49, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>
>>On January 21, 2003 at 08:52:02, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>>
>>>On January 20, 2003 at 23:00:55, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 20, 2003 at 21:57:38, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On January 20, 2003 at 21:32:22, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On January 20, 2003 at 20:44:21, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>[snip]
>>>>
>>>>>>>Round 6  Crafty vs Searcher
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>A near disaster for the first game of the second day.  The same d4 opening
>>>>>>>led to a similar position, but things did not go very well here.  First score
>>>>>>>out of book was -.42, which was typical for every 1. d4 game crafty played as
>>>>>>>white. But it was able to pull that up quickly normally.  10 moves out of book,
>>>>>>>the score hadn't changed, showing that searcher was playing very well and with
>>>>>>>a reasonable amount of understanding of the position.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Finally by move 24, Crafty was back to a slightly + score, and this held until
>>>>>>>it started dropping as it misjudged the queen/rook attacking in the center.  At
>>>>>>>move 32, the score was -.68 after 16 plies.  at move 35, the score was -1.5, at
>>>>>>>move 40 -2.0, -2.5 at move 50, -3 at move 60,  and at this point Crafty dug
>>>>>>>in its heels and pulled the score back to -2.3 where it stayed for a long
>>>>>>>while.  But it slowly traded pawns, and the score started swinting back.  By
>>>>>>>move 80, it was -2.0 again, -1.5 by move 85, -1.0 by move 95,  and it finally
>>>>>>>reported a draw score at move 102.  Of all the games it played, this was a
>>>>>>>really nice effort as it showed a lot of understanding about king rook and pawn
>>>>>>>endings, something I have worked on a lot over the years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I find your last sentence surprising. Crafty was very lucky in this game that
>>>>>>Searcherx did not play 62...Re8 62.Kxg3 Rb8 winning easily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Crafty says if you play Re8 it just plays Rb7 immediately, not Kg3.
>>>>>
>>>>>Score doesn't change much...
>>>>>
>>>>>It may be overlooking something, but it isn't going to let black get
>>>>>the rook behind the pawn...
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe we are at the wrong move?  IE you have two move 62's above.
>>>>>Do you mean 61. Re8?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yes. 61...Re8 62.Kxg3 Rb8 was my intention.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Going back to move 61, and playing Re8 Kg3 Rb8 I get Rd4 and Rb4.  White
>>>>>loses one of the pawns on the h file, but only one.  It isn't clear to me,
>>>>>without a lot of study, how black makes progress.  The pawn is blockaded, so
>>>>>the black rook is stuck on the b file unless it gives check.  The black
>>>>>king can't abandon the kingside or white will eat the g pawn and the hpawn
>>>>>should be enough to force the trade of the rook and a draw...
>>>>
>>>>[D]8/1p1R2pk/5p2/7P/7P/5Kn1/4r3/8 b - - 0 60
>>>>
>>>>61...Re8 62.Kxg3 Rb8 63.Rd4 b5 64.Rb4 Kh6 65.Kg4 Rb7 66.Kh3 Kxh5 67.Kg3 g6
>>>>68.Kh3 f5 69.Kg3 Rb6 70.Kh3 Rc6 71.Rb3 Rc4 is a prosaic and convincing win.
>>>
>>>A comparable position is available with many different continuations. One is
>>>your 61-Re8 others I pointed out in
>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?278466
>>>The point is that you always winn with the f/g free pawns if they are so good
>>>combined. No need to know the rule of the R behind the pawns because you give
>>>the b pawn away.
>>>
>>>Kind regards,
>>>Rolf Tueschen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>Even though it is later given away, it handcuffs the defense giving time to make
>>preparations before giving up the b-pawn to win on the K-side, so it is still an
>>important tool.
>
>No doubt about it. But I was looking for the programmers and you said yourself
>that this is difficult to program. So I had a look at totally normal chess,
>calculable or countable if you like. And this position with the combined pawns
>is won and that is the whole thing. I meant the argument of the "difficult"
>Re8-b8 is even not necessary.
>
>Rolf Tueschen
>
>

One of the problems here is that the f and g pawns are _not_ passed.  The f pawn
is.  The
g-pawn is not, because white hangs on to the h-pawn.  Here are the problems I
see that have
to be solved:

1.  black's rook is behind the b-pawn.  If black moves the rook without giving
check, the
pawn goes away as it is attacked by white's rook.

2.  I will assume the h5 pawn is going to "go".  After Re8 Kxg3 Rb8 Rd4 b5 Rb4
the rooks
are stuck.  Black can move to b8/b7/b6.  White can't move the rook or the pawn
advances.

3.  After black takes on h5 and white keeps the king at g3-h3 to hold the
h-pawn, black has
a couple of plans.  But not all work.  The king can't go help the rook, because
white's king makes
that a long path and it is close to the kingside pawns.  the king can't win the
white h-pawn by
itself, and it can't get the rook up to attack it.  So either the king goes to
the queenside to help
the b-pawn advance, or black tries advancing the f-pawn.

White definitely has many problems here, but the question is "are they _all_
unsolvable?"
It isn't that clear to me.  One thing is for sure, it isn't an "easy win".  It
is going to take a lot
of sweat and calculation.
>>
>>[snip]



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.