Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 18:47:28 01/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2003 at 13:43:10, Terry McCracken wrote: >On January 21, 2003 at 13:03:55, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > >>On January 21, 2003 at 08:24:15, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On January 21, 2003 at 04:34:24, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >>> >>>>On January 21, 2003 at 03:23:16, Derek Paquette wrote: >>>> >>>>>We all know that Deep Junior 7 has been modified, tweeked and probably half >>>>>re-written since it was originally released in preparation for this game in New >>>>>York vs Gary K. >>>>> >>>>>I'm looking for opinions of the members here at this board, >>>>>*on a Pentium 2.4 gigahertz computer, Junior 7 *not not Deep Junior* was running >>>>>at about 4900 - 5200 nodes per second, faster than Deep Fritz 7 was running in >>>>>Baharain (maxed out at 3400kn/s) >>>>> >>>>>With the improved strength of these engines, does Gary stand a chance against >>>>>this program? >>>>>I know that nodes/sec isn't everything, but it is something to consider, >>>>Gary stands a chance only if bad openings are selected for the Computer.Against >>>>Kramnik The Deep Fritz Openings was a great disaster.The team consistently >>>>selected the most human friendly Openings.There is no doubt in my mind that >>>>someboby was totally ignorent about some aspect of computer chess in Bahrain. >>>>All the tools for the destruction of even the strongest human players are here >>>>now ;but it seems that some programmers do not know how to use them.In Human >>>>Matches nodes/sec doesnt count for much(it does in COMP Vs COMP). >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Ali M >>> >>> >>>Kasparov has the ability to defeat DJ with any hardware or opening preparation. >>>You're speaking out of either ignorance, or just plain jealous of top level >>>players, which Kasparov is the best, at this time. >>> >>>Go check the odds on Kasparov vs DJ, the odds favour Kasparov 2:1 so you're >>>blowing smoke as usual. >>> >>> >>>TM >>No matter how many times you tear out your hair you can not stop the progress >>of technology.I saw what your hero Kramnik did against Deep Fritz.Buzz off. > >Don't lecture me you duffer! Progress is being made, I'm well aware of that and >if you paid attention to my posts about computer chess developement, you would >realize that I'm closely following that progress. > >Kramnik isn't my hero you ignorant prick, but I respect him as one of the 3 top >players alive, Kasparov, Kramnik, and Anand. > >He could have easily won his match with Deep Fritz, even after dropping a game. >He chose, in a winning position I might add, to play like Tal and threw all >winning chances into the toilet. He also let the draw slip away in time trouble >as he had to give up a piece and stopped calculating. Frustrated he resigned! >Too bad, but people are unpredictable, computers are very predictable! > >Kasparov could lose, but the odds are against it. He may only draw, like >Kramnik. Or maybe, Kasparov will play like Kasparov, and fry DJs circuits! > >Oh and I'm _not_ going to "buzz off", I've every right to post about this >subject, regardless how this makes you feel. > >TM Dont worry about DJs circuits being fried.Worry about Kasparovs Brain.Also Kramnik didnot have a winning Position in game 6 before Nxf7 (be was barely out of the opening (I dont have time to teach you computer chess)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.