Author: margolies,marc
Date: 22:13:55 01/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2003 at 11:49:43, Sandi Ordinario wrote: >Thanks for the "free"lessons, Marc. I still await your publications on the >theory of the opening and middle game in Chess. There is an IM from Texas whose >name escapes me at this time who wrote about a "reverse strategy" which is >really a form of retreat of his piece(s) so as either to draw the opponent into >untenable territory or allow a stronger piece a pathway to attack. Or in your >own words win some kind of tempo. It is a neat book because the conventional >wisdom is to marshall ones forces forward into the fray or storm the barricades >as GM Christiansen would have it in his book as fast as one could mobilize them >of course putting them in strategical or tactical positions. > >Sandi my experience as a general rule is that strong gm s dont like computers at all because they cant help them play better against other stong gm s. (not ignoring their tactical uses in blunder checking analysis but as a playing engine). i do know a few of them in new york and this is the sense i get from them.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.