Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCT5 "award" nominees?

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 22:20:15 01/21/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 21, 2003 at 04:34:43, José Carlos wrote:

>On January 20, 2003 at 21:40:14, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>
>>On January 20, 2003 at 10:33:24, José Carlos wrote:
>>
>>>On January 20, 2003 at 10:29:09, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 20, 2003 at 10:05:41, Arturo Ochoa wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Worst theoretical novelty:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>6...Rb8 in Ruffian-Diep.  Either a bug in Vincent's book building code, or
>>>>>>garbage in the PGN he used to generate it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>[D]rnbqk1r1/pp2ppbp/2p2np1/3p4/2PP4/2N1PN2/PP2BPPP/R1BQK2R w KQq -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>Hello:
>>>>>
>>>>>To call it the worst theoritical novelty is a mess.... because it was not a
>>>>>novelty, it was a severe bug...
>>>>
>>>>If we define something that was never played in the past as a novelty then it is
>>>>clearly a novelty by definition.
>>>>
>>>>The fact that the move is because of a bug does not change it.
>>>>
>>>>Uri
>>>
>>>  The term "theoretical novelty", in chess, has a special meaning: it's a
>>>novelty that is good.
>>>  So any random move can be a "novelty" but only good novelties are "theoretical
>>>novelties".
>>>
>>>  José C.
>>
>>No, TN's don't have to be good to be TNs.
>>
>>Dave
>
>  Maybe you have a different definition over there.
>  I've played chess for some years, I've played spanish ch. a couple of times,
>I've been champion of my area many times... In my experience as a chess player,
>a TN is a N which:
>  - is played by a strong player
>  - is played in a "correct" game (meaning that, after the move, there's a good
>plan)
>  - is later repeated by others
>
>  In a word, a TN is a N which proves good. A random N is _never_ considered a
>TN. Otherwise, every game would contain a TN.
>  At least, in Spain.
>
>  José C.

Well, I've seen GM-annotated games in chess books and magazines where a move is
marked both as a TN and as ?, or marked both as a TN and as ?!.  The move is not
random, it has a purpose, it's just that the idea doesn't happen to work out.  I
can't say I've ever seen a move marked as TN and ?? at the same time, though.
:-)

Dave




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.