Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 11:07:39 01/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2003 at 12:44:02, Sune Fischer wrote: >No because the table bases are identical "in" all programs. >It has nothing to do with Junior, you might as well use TSCP with tb support. TSCP would never live to see tablebases. >There is no creativity or computation when it's hitting the tables. So are you against hash tables too? No creativity or computation there either... >To ask Garry to play against perfection is a rediculous demand, I can tell you >now the tables are stronger, "hands down". What is there to prove by this, that >Garry can't play perfect? You want to humiliate him because he is not God? >Lame to the core. The problem is that not everyone shares your view Sune. You realize that no human can compete with tablebases consistently. 99.9% of the rest of the world does not. I'd like to see a computer get to use anything and everything at it's disposal, and then have a match with the best human, and see what happens. The problem is that the general population thinks that is happening, and they are misled. Kasparov can get a win, and then turn almost every game into a draw and wait to hit TB's, and then all humans will rejoice together proclaiming our superiority over computers, and it simply isn't true anymore. You know that...but most don't.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.