Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What constitutes human-like play?

Author: Sandi Ordinario

Date: 12:05:32 01/22/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 22, 2003 at 01:13:55, margolies,marc wrote:

>On January 21, 2003 at 11:49:43, Sandi Ordinario wrote:
>
>>Thanks for the "free"lessons, Marc. I still await your publications on the
>>theory of the opening and middle game in Chess. There is an IM from Texas whose
>>name escapes me at this time who wrote about a "reverse strategy" which is
>>really a form of retreat of his piece(s) so as either to draw the opponent into
>>untenable territory or allow a stronger piece a pathway to attack. Or in your
>>own words win some kind of tempo. It is a neat book because the conventional
>>wisdom is to marshall ones forces forward into the fray or storm the barricades
>>as GM Christiansen would have it in his book as fast as one could mobilize them
>>of course putting them in strategical or tactical positions.
>>
>>Sandi
>
>my experience as a general rule is that strong gm s dont like computers at all
>because they cant help them play better against other stong gm s. (not ignoring
>their tactical uses in blunder checking analysis but as a playing engine).
>i do know a few of them in new york and this is the sense i get from them.

Thanks, Marc...I play in both USChessLive and WCN and I have been disallowed to
play rated games because the TDs think I have been cheating by refering to a
chessplaying computer. I play 5 min blitz in WCN and 2min with 12sec increment
in USChL. I just had the fortune (or misfortune) of getting my provisional
rating of 1600 improve to 2000+ by luck even beating a 2500 rated GM in the
process. It was luck more than anything else because in the now defunct
Kasparovchess.com, similar thing happened to me where I was given a provisional
rating of 1500 which I was fortunate enough to increase to 2325 in a couple of
months and also beating a grandmaster in the process. In that website though
they did not accuse me of cheating unlike in USChL and WCN. I am not an
excellent player by any stretch of the imagination but more lucky than most, I
suppose. I teach chess though and am always trying to understand what
differentiates between a computer move and an average player's move in the same
position. I am fond of the book Think Like a Grandmaster by Kotov especially
where he analyzes grandmaster or candidates move with what B or C players
normally come up with. I just enjoy it.
Sandi




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.