Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Human chess means depth and knowledge

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 10:24:08 01/23/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 23, 2003 at 13:06:21, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>Today's game at Wijk between Kramnik and Topalov (still playing) is a good
>example for the class of the best GM. When Kramnik played 23.Qe4 he went for the
>win. He saw that dozens of moves later he could win in the endgame. Now the 53th
>moves was played and Kramnik has one Pawn plus. This is Kramnik as we know him
>and not how he was after these strange events in Bahrain where he played this
>commercial event.
>
>I would really like to know that our programs were that clever. But it might
>take another 30 years until this date. Too late for me. :(

30 years?! . Back in the 80s some people predicted that it would take a regular
program on a home P.C. around the year 2010 to beat the world Champion. Those
people were wrong. Deep Junior beta on a Quad 2.8 could possibly play the exact
move, and I don't doubt that even Deep Fritz 7 could too.

Pichard.

>P.S.
>
>Just follow the game here:
>http://corus.connections-it.com/corus/



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.