Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Human chess means depth and knowledge

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 10:28:34 01/23/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 23, 2003 at 13:24:08, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>On January 23, 2003 at 13:06:21, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>Today's game at Wijk between Kramnik and Topalov (still playing) is a good
>>example for the class of the best GM. When Kramnik played 23.Qe4 he went for the
>>win. He saw that dozens of moves later he could win in the endgame. Now the 53th
>>moves was played and Kramnik has one Pawn plus. This is Kramnik as we know him
>>and not how he was after these strange events in Bahrain where he played this
>>commercial event.
>>
>>I would really like to know that our programs were that clever. But it might
>>take another 30 years until this date. Too late for me. :(
>
>30 years?! . Back in the 80s some people predicted that it would take a regular
>program on a home P.C. around the year 2010 to beat the world Champion. Those
>people were wrong. Deep Junior beta on a Quad 2.8 could possibly play the exact
>move, and I don't doubt that even Deep Fritz 7 could too.

Sorry, if that might have been read as if I had said that it was exactly this
move 23. Qe4, no, it was just the long road to the win who is just there in this
moment (1:0). And you must agree that no machine today can see that deep into
the position. We know that often a good move is played for wrong reasons.

Rolf Tueschen


>
>Pichard.
>
>>P.S.
>>
>>Just follow the game here:
>>http://corus.connections-it.com/corus/



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.