Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 04:14:54 01/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2003 at 21:46:41, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On January 23, 2003 at 21:28:01, Dieter Buerssner wrote: > >>On January 23, 2003 at 19:22:16, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >> >>>I think around move 80, black have an horrible position to make progress, I >>>think it's simple draw because ideas in the payed game >> >>[D] 1R6/6pk/5p2/7P/1p4KP/3r4/8/8 b - - 0 82 >> >>Note, the "0" is not correct, but the commercial chess GUI I am using, won't do >>it right, and I am too lazy to count. My move is Rb3. How do you relpy? > > >There is no good reply. I pointed this out a while ago in a reply to Walker. >Like I said before, searcherx failed to win, because it a had a preference to >defending from the side rather than from in front (or rear). > >It seems to me searcherx has some type of eval bug. > >The move 61...b5 was just as good as 61...Re8 as it turns out. > Ok and thanks to you all but I still think that the little analysis was very important for amateur programmers at least. If other interesting positions were discussed in the same depth such a tournament would have made even more sense. Isn't chess the base of all? All the techno probs are important too, book stuff and tables, but chess code is most important. But I'm perhaps just a dreamer. Rolf Tueschen > >> >>>But at move 60 [...] >> >>I never doubted this. >> >>Regards, >>Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.