Author: Chris Carson
Date: 06:00:25 09/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 1998 at 19:03:21, John Coffey wrote: >How is the Celeron 333 compare with the Pentium II 400mhz sitting >on my desk? I assume that it is slower, but by how much? > >Has anyone tested this against the AMD-K2 350, which I hear is faster than >a PII 350? > >john coffey Take a look at Intel.com Celeron 333 (66 mhz bus) is slower (slightly) than a 300 mhz PII (66 mhz bus), see the ICOMP 2 benchmarks (this is a composite of SpecInt 95, and other benchmarks). A Celeron 333 overclocked (100 mhz bus) is slightly slower than a 400 mhz PII (100 mhz bus), see TOM's Hardware Page. My 300 PII (66 mhz bus, 64M ram) with crafty 15.19 (egtb=0) gets 128197 NPS (using the crafty benchmark option, 24M hash, 1.51XPpro). Overclocked Celeron 333 was posted earlier at 1.89XPpro = 160K+ nps, 400 Mhz PII around 187K+ NPS. Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.