Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Junior is better even if it is slower than Deeper Blue !

Author: Frank Phillips

Date: 03:19:32 01/26/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 26, 2003 at 05:35:03, Uri Blass wrote:

>On January 26, 2003 at 04:58:21, Frank Phillips wrote:
>
>>On January 26, 2003 at 03:33:23, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=750
>>
>>Then it is a shame that they will not be playing the same game that Deep Blue
>>and Kasparov played.
>>
>>Unless I have misunderstood the contract, this is a modified version of chess to
>>that defined by the standard rules, which nowhere states that because one side
>>knows that the game is drawn with perfect play then it shall be declared a draw
>>- even if the other side does not know or cannot demonstrate it.
>>
>>I would have left it to the players to behave appropriately in simple KBvKR
>>endings etc, but KRvKRP, KQPvKQ certainly has plenty of play.
>>
>>This is the commercial companies show so they can agree the rules of the
>>contest, but they do not own and cannot redefine chess - I hope.
>>
>>Frank
>
>No
>They do not need to redefine chess.


The result is the same as Amir offering the draw - which is fine.  But I believe
that they should have the choice.  I also believe that humans would err
occasionally against some of the tricker endgames, just as theory has been
overturned by databases.


Frank

>
>If the programmers decide that they offer a draw in drawn 5 piece tablebase
>position the result is going to be the same result.
>
>I do not understand why people consider it as important when there is more than
>99% chance that the problem is not going to be relevant and even if the players
>get 5 piece endgame the result of it is going to be obvious.
>
>Junior7 also does not have swindle mode and it plays the first drawing move out
>of tablebases in case of a tablebase draw.
>
>I believe that Amir Ban did not care to spend time on implementing swindle mode.
>It may be important in blitz game against humans but it probably does not give
>more than 0.1 elo rating at tournament time control against kasparov.
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.