Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 08:59:26 01/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2003 at 04:58:21, Frank Phillips wrote: >On January 26, 2003 at 03:33:23, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=750 > >Then it is a shame that they will not be playing the same game that Deep Blue >and Kasparov played. > >Unless I have misunderstood the contract, this is a modified version of chess to >that defined by the standard rules, which nowhere states that because one side >knows that the game is drawn with perfect play then it shall be declared a draw >- even if the other side does not know or cannot demonstrate it. modified version of chess? may be is a modified version of chess already when an automatic "player" is there, such a chess program, an oponnent that plays but there is no person there involved during the game, thinking the moves, that's a fictitious thing. But I understand, play against the automated player, why do care about how it works?? As long as there are no 15 piece tablebases yet, it's still a competitive thing.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.