Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 17:01:13 01/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2003 at 19:47:52, Andrew Williams wrote: >On January 26, 2003 at 19:44:40, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>Unlike the boring anti-computer display of Kramnik in Bahrain, or the nervous >>play of Kasparov against Deep Blue (and its unidentified real-time seconds), >>today Kasparov played his real chess against the world computer chess champion, >>and proved that humans are still *far* stronger than computers. >> > >(1) This was a fine win by Kasparov, and very instructive. >(2) Kasparov is hardly typical of humans. He's not even typical of GMs. >(3) The opening was critical here. > >>Some commentators didn't stop saying how weak Junior is and that Deep Blue was >>stronger. But as GM Yasser Seirawan said: "You can't say Junior played badly. >>This was just what Garry has been doing to humans for 18 years". >> >>And a quote from Kasparov: "Our only chance to dominate is to play normal >>chess". >> >>Omid. > >I don't think it's sensible to draw too many conclusions based on one game. Sensible? You're not allowed to be sensible when discussing these things! > >Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.