Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 17:49:52 01/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2003 at 20:44:36, Peter McKenzie wrote: >On January 26, 2003 at 20:02:05, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > ><snip> > >>>>Yes, let me again repeat the repeated: "humans are still *far* stronger than >>>>computers". >>> >>>You can say it as many times as you want but that doesn't make it true. >> >>Kasparov's performance does. > >You make this conclusion from one game? That is rather funny. It is not exactly a conclusion; but rather a prediction of the conclusion :-) > >What of the previous Kramnik-Fritz and Deep Blue-Kasparov matches? Kramnik - Fritz is irrelevant, it was the "not the strongest" human vs "not the strongest" computer. Deep Blue - Kasparov is even more irrelevant, as Kasparov was so nervous he performed like an under 2600 player, and God knows what (who?) Deep Blue had behind the scenes. > >> >> >>> >>>> >>>>Omid.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.