Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 18:09:13 01/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2003 at 20:49:52, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On January 26, 2003 at 20:44:36, Peter McKenzie wrote: > >>On January 26, 2003 at 20:02:05, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>>Yes, let me again repeat the repeated: "humans are still *far* stronger than >>>>>computers". >>>> >>>>You can say it as many times as you want but that doesn't make it true. >>> >>>Kasparov's performance does. >> >>You make this conclusion from one game? That is rather funny. > >It is not exactly a conclusion; but rather a prediction of the conclusion :-) > >> >>What of the previous Kramnik-Fritz and Deep Blue-Kasparov matches? > >Kramnik - Fritz is irrelevant, it was the "not the strongest" human vs "not the >strongest" computer. Deep Blue - Kasparov is even more irrelevant, as Kasparov >was so nervous he performed like an under 2600 player, and God knows what (who?) >Deep Blue had behind the scenes. > > >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Omid. Your constant accusations against Deep Blue are unfounded.Kasparov lost fair against Deep Blue.Humans are far stronger than Computers? Huh? What a general statement .Who is stronger than what ? the average home PC users that gets crushed game after game or 2 people in the entire world that are above 2800 ELO? Get your facts straight.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.