Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 18:20:50 01/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2003 at 21:09:13, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >On January 26, 2003 at 20:49:52, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>On January 26, 2003 at 20:44:36, Peter McKenzie wrote: >> >>>On January 26, 2003 at 20:02:05, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>>Yes, let me again repeat the repeated: "humans are still *far* stronger than >>>>>>computers". >>>>> >>>>>You can say it as many times as you want but that doesn't make it true. >>>> >>>>Kasparov's performance does. >>> >>>You make this conclusion from one game? That is rather funny. >> >>It is not exactly a conclusion; but rather a prediction of the conclusion :-) >> >>> >>>What of the previous Kramnik-Fritz and Deep Blue-Kasparov matches? >> >>Kramnik - Fritz is irrelevant, it was the "not the strongest" human vs "not the >>strongest" computer. Deep Blue - Kasparov is even more irrelevant, as Kasparov >>was so nervous he performed like an under 2600 player, and God knows what (who?) >>Deep Blue had behind the scenes. >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Omid. >Your constant accusations against Deep Blue are unfounded.Kasparov lost fair >against Deep Blue.Humans are far stronger than Computers? Huh? What a general >statement .Who is stronger than what ? the average home PC users that gets >crushed game after game or 2 people in the entire world that are above 2800 >ELO? Get your facts straight. You know very well that when we compare humans vs computers, we mean "strongest human" vs "strongest computer".
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.