Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:44:20 01/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2003 at 20:02:05, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On January 26, 2003 at 19:59:43, Peter McKenzie wrote: > >>On January 26, 2003 at 19:31:48, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >> >>>On January 26, 2003 at 19:28:39, Luis Smith wrote: >>> >>>>Full game >>>> >>>> 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Nf3 Nbd7 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.g4 dxc4 8.Bxc4 b6 9.e4 >>>>e5 10.g5 Nh5 11.Be3 0-0 12.0-0-0 Qc7 13.d5 b5 14.dxc6 bxc4 15.Nb5 Qxc6 16.Nxd6 >>>>Bb7 17.Qc3 Rae8 18.Nxe8 Rxe8 19.Rhe1 Qb5 20.Nd2 Rc8 21.Kb1 Nf8 22.Ka1 Ng6 23.Rc1 >>>>Ba6 24.b3 cxb3 25.Qxb3 Ra8 26.Qxb5 Bxb5 27.Rc7 Line >>> >>>Yes, let me again repeat the repeated: "humans are still *far* stronger than >>>computers". >> >>You can say it as many times as you want but that doesn't make it true. > >Kasparov's performance does. > > The statement, on its face, is false. Had it said "Kasparov is still *far* stronger..." it might be true. but it said "humans", and as a collective class, that is simply false, and provably so... >> >>> >>>Omid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.