Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Junior is better even if it is slower than Deeper Blue !

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 23:14:18 01/26/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 26, 2003 at 21:56:47, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On January 26, 2003 at 12:05:31, Sune Fischer wrote:
>
>>On January 26, 2003 at 10:39:11, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On January 26, 2003 at 05:30:01, Roger D Davis wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Unless I have misunderstood the contract, this is a modified version of chess to
>>>>>that defined by the standard rules, which nowhere states that because one side
>>>>>knows that the game is drawn with perfect play then it shall be declared a draw
>>>>>- even if the other side does not know or cannot demonstrate it.
>>>>
>>>>Presumably then, Kasparov could show up with his own set of tablebases, and
>>>>consult them during the match? Maybe he has a particular ending he's weak in. Or
>>>>do only Junior's tablebases count?
>>>
>>>
>>>Kasparov can show up with anything he wants, "in his head".  The computer is
>>>doing exactly the same.
>>
>>The computer doesn't have a head, so how can it be exactly the same?
>>
>>-S.
>
>
>Mine does.  It has short-term memory, long-term memory, processing power, etc,
>all in _one_ "container".  Just like _I_ do...

So you _do_ think it's the same?

-S.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.