Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:27:33 01/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2003 at 05:03:36, Mark Young wrote: >On January 27, 2003 at 02:05:38, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 26, 2003 at 22:45:57, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On January 26, 2003 at 22:20:46, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>> >>>>On January 26, 2003 at 22:07:32, Mark Young wrote: >>>> >>>>>Lets see what happens when Junior has white. It is clear from my point of veiw >>>>>that junior was positionally lost out of book. Deep Junior was put on the ropes >>>>>by a poor choice of opening against the best human player in history. All Junior >>>>>could do was hang on with this type of position and hope for a mistake. >>>>> >>>>>It would be a mistake to judge Deep Junior from this game. >>>> >>>>I'm not sure that the game was after opening, lost for black!? >>>> >>>>I belive that Junior makes an Blunder with his move b5?? I think that here Bb7!? >>>>(Fritz plays it!) have an good chance to a draw. >>>> >>>>But Junior is Junior and he play also aggressive b5?, and in this position >>>>(against a Super GM) is such a move than an losing move! Ok? >>> >>>I don't know if Bb7 is much better. Look at the position black is awful. Bb7 >>>still looks like slow death for black. >>> >>>Kasparov(GM) - Deep_Junior(C) >>>[d]r1b2rk1/p1qn1ppp/1ppb4/3Pp1Pn/2B1P3/2N1BN2/PPQ2P1P/2KR3R b - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Fritz 8: >>> >>>13...b5 14.dxc6 bxc4 15.cxd7 Bxd7 16.Qd2 Bg4 17.Qxd6 Qxd6 18.Rxd6 Bxf3 19.Rg1 f5 >>>20.exf5 Rxf5 >>> ² (0.37) Depth: 7/23 00:00:00 78kN >>>13...b5 14.dxc6 bxc4 15.cxd7 Bxd7 16.Qd2 Bg4 17.Qxd6 Qxd6 18.Rxd6 Bxf3 19.Rg1 a6 >>>20.Rd5 Rae8 >>> ² (0.44) Depth: 8/26 00:00:00 183kN >>>13...b5 14.dxc6 bxc4 15.cxd7 Bxd7 16.Qd2 Bg4 17.Qxd6 Qxd6 18.Rxd6 Bxf3 19.Rg1 a6 >>>20.Rd5 Rae8 >>> ² (0.44) Depth: 9/26 00:00:01 484kN >>>13...b5 14.dxc6 bxc4 15.cxd7 Bxd7 16.Qd2 Bg4 17.Qxd6 Qxd6 18.Rxd6 Bxf3 19.Rg1 a6 >>>20.Rc6 Rfc8 21.Rd6 >>> ² (0.44) Depth: 10/28 00:00:02 973kN >>>13...b5-- >>> ± (0.72) Depth: 11/28 00:00:03 1890kN >>>13...b5 14.dxc6 bxc4 >>> ± (0.72) Depth: 11/29 00:00:04 2346kN >>>13...b5 14.dxc6 bxc4 15.Nb5 Qxc6 16.Nxd6 Ba6 17.Qc3 Rab8 18.Nxe5 Nxe5 19.Qxe5 >>>Qa4 20.Bxa7 Ra8 >>> ± (0.84) Depth: 12/32 00:00:11 7647kN >>>13...Bb7! >>> ± (0.81) Depth: 12/35 00:00:37 26806kN >>>13...Bb7! >>> ² (0.66) Depth: 12/35 00:01:32 62517kN >>>13...Bb7 14.dxc6 Bxc6 15.Kb1 a6 16.Nd5 Qb8 17.Nh4 b5 18.Nf5 bxc4 19.Nxd6 Bxd5 >>> ² (0.66) Depth: 13/38 00:03:50 179812kN >>>13...Bb7 14.Nh4 cxd5 15.Bxd5 Bc5 16.Nf5 Rac8 17.Kb1 Kh8 18.Bxb7 Qxb7 19.Qd2 Rcd8 >>>20.Nd5 Rc8 >>> ² (0.66) Depth: 14/44 00:10:34 524970kN >>>13...Bb7-- >>> ± (0.94) Depth: 15/40 00:14:00 701128kN >>>13...Bb7 14.dxc6 Bxc6 >>> ± (0.94) Depth: 15/50 00:19:01 965554kN >>>13...b5! >>> ± (0.91) Depth: 15/50 00:21:50 1116781kN >>>13...b5 14.dxc6 bxc4 15.Nb5 Qxc6 16.Nxd6 Ba6 17.Qc3 Rab8 18.Nxe5 Nxe5 19.Qxe5 >>>Qa4 20.Kb1 >>> ± (0.78) Depth: 15/50 00:22:28 1150074kN >>>13...b5 14.dxc6 bxc4 15.Nb5 Qxc6 16.Nxd6 Ba6 17.Qc3 Rab8 18.Nxe5 Nxe5 19.Qxe5 >>>Qa4 20.Kb1 >>> ± (0.78) Depth: 16/43 00:26:52 1378581kN >>>13...b5 14.dxc6 bxc4 15.Nb5 Qxc6 16.Nxd6 Bb7 17.Rd2 Nf4 18.Bxf4 exf4 19.Rhd1 Nb6 >>>20.Qc3 >>> ± (0.87) Depth: 17/48 00:38:06 1975394kN >>>13...Bb7! >>> ± (0.84) Depth: 17/48 01:17:26 4054605kN >>>13...Bb7 14.dxc6 Bxc6 15.Nb5 Bxb5 16.Bxb5 Nc5 17.b4 Nxe4 18.Bc6 Nc3 19.Qxc3 Bxb4 >>>20.Qc2 Rac8 >>> ± (0.78) Depth: 17/48 02:35:57 8119417kN >>> >>>(Young, MyTown 26.01.2003) >> >>I think that in the last line 17...Ne6 is better than 17...Nxe4 but I do not >>know if we can trust the main line of Fritz except the first move. >> >>I do not like 14.dxc6 that is suggested by Fritz8's main line but I do not find >>convincing alternative for white. >>It may be interesting to see what programs play with white after 13...Bb7 >>but unfortunately I can find no win for white after that move and it seems more >>and more to me that Junior had good drawing chances with Bb7. >> >>Uri > >Well Be7 is hard for Fritz 8 to hang onto. It looks like both moves lose and >Fritz 8 is switching from b5 and Bb7 as the scores drop worse for one move then >the other. Don't blame Junior...I think the position is lost no matter what is >played. Look what Fritz 8 shows after a long search. Both b5 and Bb7 scores drop >as the search gets longer, and the program bounces back and forth beween the >moves. Seeing this you can not be too hard on Junior as Fritz 8 would also chose >b5 at certain times. If Bb7 is drawing then Junior was unlucky because I bet it >would also bounce between Bb7 and b5 in its search. It seems to me that these programs (Junior and Fritz) are not materiaslistic enough and prefer illusions and not material. both b5 and Rae8 lose material based on my analysis. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.