Author: Rex
Date: 06:08:20 01/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
Running my personal settings on CM9000 it played Rae8 also. 00:00:00.0 -1.34 3001 1827 Rae8 Qb4 Nb6 Nxe8 Rxe8 00:00:00.0 -1.34 3001 1827 Rae8 Qb4 Nb6 Nxe8 Rxe8 00:00:00.0 -1.13 4001 6039 Rae8 Qb4 Ba6 Nxe8 Rxe8 00:00:00.2 -1.34 5001 32684 Rae8 Qb4 Ba6 Nxe8 Rxe8 Qd6 00:00:00.7 -1.10 6001 91647 Rae8 Qb4 Rb8 Qa5 Nf4 Bxf4 exf4 00:00:02.2 -0.95 7001 317792 Rae8 Qb4 Rb8 h4 Ba6 Qc3 Nf4 Bxf4 exf4 00:00:04.7 -0.89 8001 714447 Rae8 Qb4 Rb8 Qa5 Nf4 Bxf4 exf4 Kb1 Qc5 00:00:19.7 -0.66 9001 3180050 Rae8 Qd2 Rb8 Rhe1 Qa4 Kb1 Ba8 Qc3 Nf4 00:00:47.0 -0.81 10001 7812137 Rae8 Qb4 Rb8 Bxa7 Nf4 Bxb8 Rxb8 Qxc4 On January 27, 2003 at 08:00:07, Mike Hood wrote: >Like many other spectators I was surprised by Deep Junior's 17th move. > >[D] r4rk1/pb1n1ppp/2qN4/4p1Pn/2p1P3/2Q1BN2/PP3P1P/2KR3R b - - 0 17 > >The quality sacrifice seems to achieve nothing. Chessbase's commentary on the >move is "Gives a rook for a knight in order to save the pawn on e5" and gives a >brief alternative line. I'm sure there is more to it than this. Could someone >please post an analysis of what would have happened if DJ had played other >moves, in particular Rab8? I don't see how Rab8 could have lead to anything >worse than what actually happened.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.