Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Junior is better even if it is slower than Deeper Blue !

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 07:10:51 01/27/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 27, 2003 at 08:45:32, Matthew Hull wrote:
>>>
>>>Mine does.  It has short-term memory, long-term memory, processing power, etc,
>>>all in _one_ "container".  Just like _I_ do...
>>
>>So you _do_ think it's the same?
>
>Of course.  So is book.lrn position.lrn.  They are the same kinds of data, i.e.
>long term memory.  It's not reasonable to make a program "forget" between games.
> Makes no sense.

When did Junior ever "remember" the table bases?

>It's the same for programs that are nueral nets.  Those nets are saved and
>retrieved from disk.
>
>Tis logical, yes?

You can argue either point, but not both points at the same time, so I was
trying to clearify what he meant :)

http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?279718

-S.

>Matt
>
>
>>
>>-S.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.