Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 12:30:16 01/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2003 at 14:58:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 27, 2003 at 02:14:18, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>On January 26, 2003 at 21:56:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On January 26, 2003 at 12:05:31, Sune Fischer wrote: >>> >>>>On January 26, 2003 at 10:39:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 26, 2003 at 05:30:01, Roger D Davis wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>Unless I have misunderstood the contract, this is a modified version of chess to >>>>>>>that defined by the standard rules, which nowhere states that because one side >>>>>>>knows that the game is drawn with perfect play then it shall be declared a draw >>>>>>>- even if the other side does not know or cannot demonstrate it. >>>>>> >>>>>>Presumably then, Kasparov could show up with his own set of tablebases, and >>>>>>consult them during the match? Maybe he has a particular ending he's weak in. Or >>>>>>do only Junior's tablebases count? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Kasparov can show up with anything he wants, "in his head". The computer is >>>>>doing exactly the same. >>>> >>>>The computer doesn't have a head, so how can it be exactly the same? >>>> >>>>-S. >>> >>> >>>Mine does. It has short-term memory, long-term memory, processing power, etc, >>>all in _one_ "container". Just like _I_ do... >> >>So you _do_ think it's the same? >> >>-S. > > >No. I just think that when I play a game, I play with what is in my >"container". The computer >does the same. There is absolutely no way to make them "the same". One is >formulated from >silicon/copper/etc, the other from carbon materials. The concept of "the same" >is >fundamentally flawed.... For what did we develop the concepts of fairness and justice in the last 5000 years? Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.