Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 13:15:32 01/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2003 at 16:00:40, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >On January 27, 2003 at 12:42:09, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>On January 27, 2003 at 12:35:50, Georg Langrath wrote: >> >>>I tried to let Chessmaster 9000 play against itself in endgame KRKQ. The side >>>KR with tablebases and the side KQ without. KQ-side wasn?t nearer checkmate in >>>move 50 than in move 1, even with 3 minutes per move. It is rather amusing to >>>look at. I think that it is impossible for a computer to solve without special >>>knowledge or tablebases as in the case KBNK. >>>Georg >> >>Now do the experiment again but let a strong human play for the KQ-side and see >>whether the result is any different. ;) >> >>Sargon > >A strong player will win this ending after the second or third try if he has not >practised before. It is not really difficult, even a weak player like I can win >against a computer with tablebases after some practise. >José. Wasn't there this experiment with some GMs who failed to win when they played against the TBs? Or am I mixing this with another endgame? Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.