Author: Jeff White
Date: 18:25:41 01/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2003 at 19:22:19, andrew tanner wrote: > There seems to be no basis for this belief other than DEEP BLUE and it's >legacy, which is a legacy of "the sky is falling" type of despair. If computers >continue to improve tactically, then GM's will learn from them and also improve >tactically. Man has always improved in everything he does. Accelerated rates of >improvement for chess computers with faster hardware or knowldege doesn't >automatically translate into wins against strong GM's. Bring it on. > > -A.T. In my opinion, until a computer beats a human World Champion under REAL match conditions (24 game match @ 2 1/2 hours for 40 moves.) you can't REALLY take these kinds of matches serious. They are fun to watch, but until it is possible to play a real match against the World Champion or any GM that will agree to play under these conditions, that's all they'll be to me. Regards, Jeff
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.