Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 23:23:52 01/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 01:23:08, Harald Faber wrote: >On January 28, 2003 at 01:10:48, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On January 27, 2003 at 19:22:19, andrew tanner wrote: >> >>> There seems to be no basis for this belief other than DEEP BLUE and it's >>>legacy, which is a legacy of "the sky is falling" type of despair. If computers >>>continue to improve tactically, then GM's will learn from them and also improve >>>tactically. Man has always improved in everything he does. Accelerated rates of >>>improvement for chess computers with faster hardware or knowldege doesn't >>>automatically translate into wins against strong GM's. Bring it on. >>> >>> -A.T. >> >>Hi, >> >>I do not agree. >> >>I think with the right approch and a fast hardware Shredder can win the match >>also now if we were allowed to. >> >>Sandro Necchi > > >Statements which the world does not need. >Couldn't Christophe, Frans and all the other programmers who DO NOT play this >math vs. Kasparov claim "WE WOULD/COULS win the match." ? > >Sounds like the usual "know-it-all".
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.