Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 23:34:15 01/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2003 at 19:31:48, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On January 26, 2003 at 19:28:39, Luis Smith wrote: > >>Full game >> >> 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Nf3 Nbd7 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.g4 dxc4 8.Bxc4 b6 9.e4 >>e5 10.g5 Nh5 11.Be3 0-0 12.0-0-0 Qc7 13.d5 b5 14.dxc6 bxc4 15.Nb5 Qxc6 16.Nxd6 >>Bb7 17.Qc3 Rae8 18.Nxe8 Rxe8 19.Rhe1 Qb5 20.Nd2 Rc8 21.Kb1 Nf8 22.Ka1 Ng6 23.Rc1 >>Ba6 24.b3 cxb3 25.Qxb3 Ra8 26.Qxb5 Bxb5 27.Rc7 Line > >Yes, let me again repeat the repeated: "humans are still *far* stronger than >computers". > >Omid. You are making fast conclusions from one game only. Kasparov is still stronger, this is true, but has only one way to play to win and he needs to keep his concentration and make not tactical mistakes. If he is able to he should win, but not by a high margin. If he makes mistakes like against Deep Blue or like Kramnik he may loose. Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.