Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 23:57:15 01/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 02:45:40, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On January 28, 2003 at 02:29:33, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On January 28, 2003 at 01:23:08, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On January 28, 2003 at 01:10:48, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>On January 27, 2003 at 19:22:19, andrew tanner wrote: >>>> >>>>> There seems to be no basis for this belief other than DEEP BLUE and it's >>>>>legacy, which is a legacy of "the sky is falling" type of despair. If computers >>>>>continue to improve tactically, then GM's will learn from them and also improve >>>>>tactically. Man has always improved in everything he does. Accelerated rates of >>>>>improvement for chess computers with faster hardware or knowldege doesn't >>>>>automatically translate into wins against strong GM's. Bring it on. >>>>> >>>>> -A.T. >>>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>I do not agree. >>>> >>>>I think with the right approch and a fast hardware Shredder can win the match >>>>also now if we were allowed to. >>>> >>>>Sandro Necchi >>> >>> >>>Statements which the world does not need. >>>Couldn't Christophe, Frans and all the other programmers who DO NOT play this >>>math vs. Kasparov claim "WE WOULD/COULS win the match." ? >>> >>>Sounds like the usual "know-it-all". >> >>Hi, >> >>you forgot that we were not allowed to play under fair rules like Junior is >>playing now. >> >>It is not my fault if they proposed to us ridiculus rules. Since I am a chess >>player (I was, since I am not playing anymore, but only work to improve the >>Shredder openings book), I cannot accept rules which have nothing to share with >>chess. >> >>For this reason we refused to play. >> >>I have been dreaming and preparing for this match since 1978 when I started >>making my Master opening book. >> >>You can say or believe whatever you like. >> >>When we will be allowed to play kasparov or the World Champion you'll see what I >>mean! >> >>Sandro Necchi > >Why dont you play Anand for example. He is a nice guy and will accept fair >rules. He is not weaker as Kasparov or Kramnik regarding pure chess strength. >his only weakness: he dont pull faces and usually dont try to intimidate his >opponents with his behaviour. this is not important for man vs machine. > >Michael The biggest SPLASH would be to challenge Bobby Fischer, for the same amount of money being offered to Kasparov. But I personally believe that Anand will beat Shredder easy. Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.