Author: Chuck
Date: 00:21:27 01/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 01:10:48, Sandro Necchi wrote: >On January 27, 2003 at 19:22:19, andrew tanner wrote: > >> There seems to be no basis for this belief other than DEEP BLUE and it's >>legacy, which is a legacy of "the sky is falling" type of despair. If computers >>continue to improve tactically, then GM's will learn from them and also improve >>tactically. Man has always improved in everything he does. Accelerated rates of >>improvement for chess computers with faster hardware or knowldege doesn't >>automatically translate into wins against strong GM's. Bring it on. >> >> -A.T. > >Hi, > >I do not agree. > >I think with the right approch and a fast hardware Shredder can win the match >also now if we were allowed to. > >Sandro Necchi One thing is for sure, Shredder 7's book was prepared for the line played in game 1, so Kasparov would have had to search for something else. Chuck
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.