Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 05:02:25 01/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 02:57:15, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On January 28, 2003 at 02:45:40, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On January 28, 2003 at 02:29:33, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>On January 28, 2003 at 01:23:08, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>On January 28, 2003 at 01:10:48, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 27, 2003 at 19:22:19, andrew tanner wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> There seems to be no basis for this belief other than DEEP BLUE and it's >>>>>>legacy, which is a legacy of "the sky is falling" type of despair. If computers >>>>>>continue to improve tactically, then GM's will learn from them and also improve >>>>>>tactically. Man has always improved in everything he does. Accelerated rates of >>>>>>improvement for chess computers with faster hardware or knowldege doesn't >>>>>>automatically translate into wins against strong GM's. Bring it on. >>>>>> >>>>>> -A.T. >>>>> >>>>>Hi, >>>>> >>>>>I do not agree. >>>>> >>>>>I think with the right approch and a fast hardware Shredder can win the match >>>>>also now if we were allowed to. >>>>> >>>>>Sandro Necchi >>>> >>>> >>>>Statements which the world does not need. >>>>Couldn't Christophe, Frans and all the other programmers who DO NOT play this >>>>math vs. Kasparov claim "WE WOULD/COULS win the match." ? >>>> >>>>Sounds like the usual "know-it-all". >>> >>>Hi, >>> > >>>you forgot that we were not allowed to play under fair rules like Junior is >>>playing now. >>> >>>It is not my fault if they proposed to us ridiculus rules. Since I am a chess >>>player (I was, since I am not playing anymore, but only work to improve the >>>Shredder openings book), I cannot accept rules which have nothing to share with >>>chess. >>> >>>For this reason we refused to play. >>> >>>I have been dreaming and preparing for this match since 1978 when I started >>>making my Master opening book. >>> >>>You can say or believe whatever you like. >>> >>>When we will be allowed to play kasparov or the World Champion you'll see what I >>>mean! >>> >>>Sandro Necchi >> >>Why dont you play Anand for example. He is a nice guy and will accept fair >>rules. He is not weaker as Kasparov or Kramnik regarding pure chess strength. >>his only weakness: he dont pull faces and usually dont try to intimidate his >>opponents with his behaviour. this is not important for man vs machine. >> >>Michael > > >The biggest SPLASH would be to challenge Bobby Fischer, for the same amount of >money being offered to Kasparov. But I personally believe that Anand will beat >Shredder easy. Hi, I do not agree. I am not saying we are stronger, but that we can win. David was not stronger than Golia, but won! > >Pichard Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.