Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:18:40 01/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 01:10:48, Sandro Necchi wrote: >On January 27, 2003 at 19:22:19, andrew tanner wrote: > >> There seems to be no basis for this belief other than DEEP BLUE and it's >>legacy, which is a legacy of "the sky is falling" type of despair. If computers >>continue to improve tactically, then GM's will learn from them and also improve >>tactically. Man has always improved in everything he does. Accelerated rates of >>improvement for chess computers with faster hardware or knowldege doesn't >>automatically translate into wins against strong GM's. Bring it on. >> >> -A.T. > >Hi, > >I do not agree. > >I think with the right approch and a fast hardware Shredder can win the match >also now if we were allowed to. > >Sandro Necchi Nonsense of course. Shredder is a too passive program for that. Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.