Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:24:53 01/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 08:11:15, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On January 28, 2003 at 08:05:57, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>As someone mentioned after the game, it is hard to imagine Junior losing in just >>27 moves, had it not used the opening book. Today, the top programs already play >>in a super-Grandmaster level (well, that doesn't include Kasparov of course), so >>why should they blindly play variations played by players weaker than them? >> >>Of course, turning the opening books off totally is not a viable option, as the >>programs still don't have the needed strategic vision to find their way early in >>the opening phase. But maybe a stricter limit (depending on type of opening, >>games played, statistics, etc) should be imposed for choosing moves right out of >>the opening book. >> >>Omid. > >One idea can be: play a move from the opening book only if played by someone >with a rating higher than you (with statistically sound results in this line). >So maybe in our future opening books we will have to also add the average rating >of the players of each move... I already posted some different ideas about opening books see http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?279989 I do not like trusting blindly other players even if the players are better. The problem is that the program may get positions that it does not know to play. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.