Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 06:39:39 01/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 08:11:15, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On January 28, 2003 at 08:05:57, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>As someone mentioned after the game, it is hard to imagine Junior losing in just >>27 moves, had it not used the opening book. Today, the top programs already play >>in a super-Grandmaster level (well, that doesn't include Kasparov of course), so >>why should they blindly play variations played by players weaker than them? >> >>Of course, turning the opening books off totally is not a viable option, as the >>programs still don't have the needed strategic vision to find their way early in >>the opening phase. But maybe a stricter limit (depending on type of opening, >>games played, statistics, etc) should be imposed for choosing moves right out of >>the opening book. >> >>Omid. > >One idea can be: play a move from the opening book only if played by someone >with a rating higher than you (with statistically sound results in this line). >So maybe in our future opening books we will have to also add the average rating >of the players of each move... Nahhh. There is no way to protect you against a Kasparov TN. The best way would be to do exactly what Kasparov does: Study for years with a team of GMs, research the opening and store in a "folder" a selected arsenal and change it. Have your own theory (a la Botvinnik) and depend on nobody. Miguel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.