Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Suggestion to Shaun Graham

Author: John Coffey

Date: 12:54:08 09/26/98


Shaun,

Your perception that you have been slighted seems to me to be way out of
proportion of what actually happened here.  Nobdy should ever request that
someone not respond to a post, and if somebody does respond to a post in
a very minor way against your wishes, it should not invoke such outrage on your
part.  If you feel that someone has made personal attacks against you then you
should take that up with the moderators or the person, rather than "make a
scene."

I found that mild attempts at humor can be interpretted as a personal attack.
Email and electronic bulletin boards are an imperfect form of communication,
because we lose the ability to get the intonation and expression of the other
person.  As a result people make assumptions about the other person's intent
that might not be valid.

The responses that you have given to whatever mild slights might have existed
have been much larger offenses.  To call someone a liar for violating
a previous agreement is very innacurate.  There
is a difference betwen lying and adhearing to a promise less than 100% of the
time.  As far as I can tell, nobody has been engaging in such name calling
toward you, and even if they were, it was a mild jab of humor.

My suggestion is to have a little thicker skin.  People don't always say
exactly the right things in the right way.  People don't always do the right
things.  Sometimes email communication gets confused.   If  you have been
offended then say so, but then drop it.

Best wishes,

john Coffey



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.