Author: Jorge
Date: 08:58:57 01/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2003 at 20:50:18, stuart taylor wrote: >On January 27, 2003 at 07:54:27, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On January 26, 2003 at 22:41:17, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>I'm happy to have been wrong, and I hope that the computer will be given its >>>REAL challenge now, not just a pretend show. >>>If Kasparov wins 4.5-1.5 I think that would be the most convincing result to >>>hope for (and then of course, the program should prove it was indeed atleast as >>>strong as Fritz etc.). >>>That's what I would LIKE to see. >>>Then we will know that human understanding is REALLY correct and that computer >>>success is usually only due to human frailty. >>>Then, I will again be more interested in chess, as well as computer chess. >>> >>>Doesn't everyone understand me? >>> :P >>>S.Taylor >> >>I wasn't commenting your postion one way or the other. I was just giving my >>honest prediction. >> >> Albert > >Sometimes, I just go under the last post to keep it tidy and to tempt more >people to open it. >Still, unfortunately, no one has commented on my main thoughts, which is most >often the case with these insights. >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.