Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 12:11:42 01/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 08:18:40, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On January 28, 2003 at 01:10:48, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On January 27, 2003 at 19:22:19, andrew tanner wrote: >> >>> There seems to be no basis for this belief other than DEEP BLUE and it's >>>legacy, which is a legacy of "the sky is falling" type of despair. If computers >>>continue to improve tactically, then GM's will learn from them and also improve >>>tactically. Man has always improved in everything he does. Accelerated rates of >>>improvement for chess computers with faster hardware or knowldege doesn't >>>automatically translate into wins against strong GM's. Bring it on. >>> >>> -A.T. >> >>Hi, >> >>I do not agree. >> >>I think with the right approch and a fast hardware Shredder can win the match >>also now if we were allowed to. >> >>Sandro Necchi > >Nonsense of course. Shredder is a too passive program for that. Well, cannot give info, but this is not true anymore... With the std. passive style I would agree with you but there are other way to change things... I have been studying this for years and I was with MChess the first one to beat a GM at long time controls. 6 games (GM Igor Efimov). It was M-Chess 6.5 running on a 200 MHz Pentium MMX Believe, I know what I am saying. > >Best regards, >Vincent Best regards Sandro
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.