Author: James T. Walker
Date: 14:36:12 01/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 14:08:16, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On January 28, 2003 at 13:55:53, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On January 28, 2003 at 13:37:16, Drexel,Michael wrote: >> >>>On January 28, 2003 at 13:27:08, James T. Walker wrote: >>> >>>>It looks to me like Bareev was playing for a draw from the opening bell. The >>>>old anticomputer game of swap off all the pieces and get to an endgame where >>>>computers are weak. They are not as weak as they used to be though.. >>>>Jim >>> >>>Bareev had the Black pieces. Hiarcs X played for a draw with his choice to play >>>the exchange variation of the French defence. >> >>And then the GM made every attempt to force a swapping of pieces. > >Yes, because his pawn?s c4 and c6 are on the light squares and white has a >blacksquare bishop.So the rule say exchange the pieces and play a comfortable >endgame.Playing different is against the logic of chess.Bareev can?t play >against the logic of chess as a good player.Hiarcs had played with the >exchangevariation of the french for a draw. > >So the programers have a problem with the french defence and it is not solved. > >Greetings >TL Thanks for your explanation Thomas. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.