Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 16:04:38 01/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 19:01:34, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>On January 28, 2003 at 18:52:37, Andrew Williams wrote:
>
>>A very exciting game. Kasparov sacced the exchange, then after a
>>mistake(25...Qa1), DJ sacced its Queen to force a draw!
>>
>>A game which should make computers and their advocates VERY worried, as every
>>computer was saying that White was doing fine while John Fedorowicz was calmly
>>informing us that Kasparov had it all under control. Fantastic fun!
>>
>>
>>[Event "X3D Man-Machine match"]
>>[Site "New York City"]
>>[Date "2003.01.28"]
>>[Round "2"]
>>[White "Deep_Junior(C)"]
>>[Black "Kasparov_1/2"]
>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>[Opening "Sicilian: Kan, Polugaievsky variation"]
>>[ECO "B42"]
>>[NIC "SI.42"]
>>[Time "14:47:06"]
>>[TimeControl "7200+0"]
>>
>>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 a6 5. Bd3 Bc5 6. Nb3 Ba7 7. c4 Nc6 8.
>>Nc3 d6 9. O-O Nge7 10. Re1 O-O 11. Be3 e5 12. Nd5 a5 13. Rc1 a4 14. Bxa7
>>Rxa7 15. Nd2 Nd4 16. Qh5 Ne6 17. Rc3 Nc5 18. Bc2 Nxd5 19. exd5 g6 20. Qh6 f5
>>21. Ra3 Qf6 22. b4 axb3 23. Rxa7 bxc2 24. Rc1 e4 25. Rxc2 Qa1+ 26. Nf1 f4
>>27. Ra8 e3 28. fxe3 fxe3 29. Qxf8+ Kxf8 30. Rxc8+ Kf7 {Game drawn} 1/2-1/2
>
>The computers did not understand it as well as the humans, up to a point. Once
>22. b4 was played, the computers understood very well. Computers saw that 25.
>... f4 was better than 25. ... Qa1, and in fact they saw the game as drawn at or
>near that point.
>
>bruce
Yes, that's true. After 25...Qa1, the computers were way ahead of the human
analysts.
Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.