Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: no stupid book, no slow hardware; just superior human brain this time

Author: Drexel,Michael

Date: 17:04:24 01/28/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 28, 2003 at 19:18:58, Daniel Clausen wrote:

>On January 28, 2003 at 18:52:37, Andrew Williams wrote:
>
>>A very exciting game. Kasparov sacced the exchange, then after a
>>mistake(25...Qa1), DJ sacced its Queen to force a draw!
>
>Yeah, sadly Kasparov didn't play f4 (instead of Qa1) during the game. I was
>looking forward to read here whether Junior lost the 2nd game because of its
>incredibly stupid book, because of the insanely slow hardware or just because
>it's not nearly as strong as Fritz, Shredder or any other commercial.
>
>Sargon

:)
The fact that he spoiled the win doesnt change anything. He has outplayed DJ
again. maybe some programs wouldnt have played b4 but they would have played
some other useless moves like Qh5 for example. Computers have no idea what to do
in this type of position.
Maybe Kasparov had been lost his concentration for a moment while enjoying his
superiority.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.