Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Show events ... VERY FUNNY GAME! DJ is one of US!!!!!!

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 17:11:35 01/28/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 28, 2003 at 19:20:00, stuart taylor wrote:

>On January 28, 2003 at 18:52:20, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>On January 28, 2003 at 18:49:18, stuart taylor wrote:
>>
>>>On January 28, 2003 at 18:39:08, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>>>
>>>>As I wrote, Kasparov had to find a good way to keep it interesting after the
>>>>smashing game on Sunday. Well, he found it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Qa1 throws a safe win! And nobody could tell me that Kasparov needs a computer
>>>>to see that f4 is better. (GM Müller from Germany claimed that argument.)
>>>>Well now we'll see the same we saw in Bahrain.
>>>>
>>>>Show events.
>>>>
>>>>:((
>>>>
>>>>Rolf Tueschen
>>>
>>>
>>>Excellent job DJ after Q:R!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  After Kasparovs acrobatics, DJ
>>>shows what it's made of!
>>>Ok, so DJ didn't go in for a strategic k-side attack against Kasparov, but it
>>>sure made Kasparov explode, and DJ might even reap the benefits!
>>>It's really thrilling watching this in real time!
>>>S.Taylor
>>
>>
>>
>>Yeah, if this isn't real what is the real time worth?  :O)
>>
>>
>>Rolf Tueschen
>
>I don't understand. If it isn't real, then how can it be real TIME?

Ok, when David Copperfield did break the Chinese Wall that wasn't done in real
time. But K can well play chess in real time and still it's a show. His
oversight in the second in 1997 was different. There he was suspicious that he
were cheated. But here he simply should have played down the line of his own
plan. But he was satisfied with the potential win. And the rest was to keep it
interesting. Or what would we have said if DJ had lost two times in a row
without showing real understanding. So K let it look good with QxR. So he had
the potential win AND the satisfaction of total control in the event. And you
can be sure that he likes it. Male like such patronizing with women too. ;)

Rolf Tueschen


>
>Anyway, I'm too shell shocked to see that Kasparov himself is proving he should
>have won! But it looks like Kasparov did indeed overlook Q:R! I wasn't sure
>exactly what was going on at the time, but I immeadiately sensed that it must
>have been something which Kasparov might not have seen.
>Us humans must be careful, whoEVER we are!
>S.Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.