Author: James Robertson
Date: 14:28:18 09/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 1998 at 17:22:18, John Coffey wrote: >On September 26, 1998 at 17:15:18, Shaun Graham wrote: > >>It has nothing to do with thick skin, it has to do with the right to be free of >>Harrassment. In Legal terms, if you tell someone on more than two occasions to >>cease communication with you, that fullfills that statute of Harrassment. >>Legally on this basis, i could have Bob Hyatt served with a protection order. >>Because he has continued this harassment after being told to desist. Yes the >>statute does indeed include electronic comunicae. You act like i'm asking for >>something big, i'm asking simply that bob hyatt leave me alone. >>> >>Shaun > > >This last paragraph has logic that I do not agree with. R.H. didn't communicate >with you at all. He responded to one of your posts. There is a critical >difference there. I read his response, and it was directed to all of CCC >and not to you specifically. Furthermore this is a public forum. If you >post messages here then you should expect people to respond to them. That >is how things work here. There is a huge difference between this and someone >harassing you with personal email. > >John coffey I envy you; you are so much more eloquent than me! My posts sound totally confused! James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.