Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 09:22:55 01/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 20:12:56, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 28, 2003 at 18:39:08, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>As I wrote, Kasparov had to find a good way to keep it interesting after the >>smashing game on Sunday. Well, he found it. >> >> >>Qa1 throws a safe win! And nobody could tell me that Kasparov needs a computer >>to see that f4 is better. (GM Müller from Germany claimed that argument.) >>Well now we'll see the same we saw in Bahrain. >> >>Show events. >> >>:(( >> >>Rolf Tueschen > >I have another theory. > >Kasparov saw that Qa1+ is leading to at least a draw for him. >He probably believed that f4 is winning but was not sure about it and prefered >not to take risks when f4 is not a simple win even in case that kasparov has >nothing to worry about it(a possible line is >(25...f4 26.Nf1 e3 27.Ra8 Qf5 28.Rxc8 Rxc8 29.Qh3 and white fights for a draw in >the endgame). > >Uri I have a third theroy. Kasparov is a human being. Human beings makes mistakes. He thought that Qa1 was winning as well as he afterward thought that f4 is. Further analysis doesn't clearly show whether f4 is winning or not. /Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.