Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Ed's "indirect addressing"

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 23:00:57 01/29/03

Go up one level in this thread

On January 30, 2003 at 01:34:19, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On January 30, 2003 at 00:05:35, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>Try the following with your compiler inside of your profiler:
>
>With MSVC 6 Pro...
>
>        Func          Func+Child           Hit
>        Time   %         Time      %      Count  Function
>---------------------------------------------------------
>    3819.452  34.0     3819.452  34.0  1000000 _swi (test.obj)
>    3718.852  33.1     3718.852  33.1  1000000 _poi (test.obj)
>    3710.973  33.0     3710.973  33.0  1000000 _arr (test.obj)
>       0.000   0.0    11213.196  99.7        1 _main (test.obj)

Interesting.  MS VC++ usually has huge differences for the different methods.

What optimization settings did you use?

• Re: Ed's "indirect addressing" Russell Reagan 05:30:51 01/30/03
  • Re: Ed's "indirect addressing" Andreas Guettinger 12:51:12 01/30/03
    • Re: Ed's "indirect addressing" Dann Corbit 13:38:11 01/30/03
      • Re: Ed's "indirect addressing" Dann Corbit 13:46:44 01/30/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.