Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The ultimative testposition (from DeepJunior8-Kasparov)

Author: Tony Werten

Date: 23:28:42 01/29/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 29, 2003 at 19:39:27, Geo Disher wrote:

>On January 29, 2003 at 13:25:41, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>
>>[D]2b2rk1/rp5p/3p1qpQ/2nPpp2/p1P5/R7/PPBN1PPP/4R1K1 w - - avoid 21.b4?
>>
>>According to Garry Kasparov 21.b4? was the desicive mistake of the game in
>>whites play.See also:
>>http://www.worldchessrating.com/521916158.html?448451195843518
>>
>>So is there a program in the world that can handle this position right?
>>
>>Gentleman start your engines.
>>
>>TL
>>
>>PS: Don´t take the headline too serios.
>New game
>2b2rk1/rp5p/3p1qpQ/2nPpp2/p1P5/R7/PPBN1PPP/4R1K1 w - - 0 1
>New game
>2b2rk1/rp5p/3p1qpQ/2nPpp2/p1P5/R7/PPBN1PPP/4R1K1 w - - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Fritz 8:
>
>1.b4 axb3 2.Rxa7 bxc2 3.Qe3 f4 4.Qf3 Bf5
>  ±  (0.78)   Depth: 7/18   00:00:00  37kN
>1.b4 axb3 2.Rxa7 bxc2 3.Qe3 f4 4.Qf3 Bf5
>  ±  (0.78)   Depth: 8/16   00:00:00  148kN
>1.b4 axb3 2.Rxa7 bxc2 3.Rc1 f4 4.Nb3 Bf5 5.Nxc5
>  ±  (0.78)   Depth: 9/20   00:00:00  359kN
>1.b4 axb3 2.Rxa7 bxc2 3.Rc1 f4 4.Nb3 e4 5.Nxc5 dxc5 6.Ra8 f3
>  ±  (0.81)   Depth: 10/25   00:00:01  809kN
>1.b4 axb3 2.Rxa7 bxc2 3.Rc1 f4 4.Rxc2 e4 5.Rc1 Bg4 6.Rb1
>  ±  (0.81)   Depth: 11/28   00:00:02  1817kN
>1.b4 axb3 2.Rxa7 bxc2 3.Rc1 f4 4.Rxc2 e4 5.h3 Bd7 6.Rc1 Rc8
>  ²  (0.66)   Depth: 12/30   00:00:05  4677kN
>1.b4 axb3 2.Rxa7 bxc2 3.Rc1 f4 4.Rxc2 e4 5.h3 Qa1+ 6.Nf1 Qf6 7.Re2 Bd7
>  ²  (0.59)   Depth: 13/31   00:00:19  16592kN
>1.b4 axb3 2.Rxa7 bxc2 3.Rc1 f4 4.Rxc2 e4 5.h3 Bf5 6.Nf1 e3 7.Re2 Bd3
>  ²  (0.34)   Depth: 14/34   00:00:41  35803kN
>1.b4 axb3 2.Rxa7 bxc2 3.Rc1 f4 4.Rxc2 e4 5.Nf1 e3 6.Re2 exf2+ 7.Kh1 Nd3 8.g4
>  =  (0.22)   Depth: 15/34   00:03:05  151682kN
>1.b4 axb3 2.Rxa7 bxc2 3.Rc1 f4 4.Rxc2 e4 5.h3 Bf5 6.Nb3 e3 7.Re2
>  ²  (0.38)   Depth: 16/39   00:09:41  497757kN
>1.b4--
>  =  (0.09)   Depth: 17/40   00:15:46  822716kN
>1.b4 axb3 2.Rxa7 bxc2 3.Rc1 f4 4.Rxc2 e4 5.Nf1 e3 6.Nxe3 fxe3
>  =  (-0.16)   Depth: 17/57   00:17:13  908059kN
>1.Nf3!
>  =  (-0.12)   Depth: 17/57   01:02:46  3375253kN
>1.Nf3!
>  =  (0.03)   Depth: 17/57   01:09:21  3724684kN
>1.Nf3 e4 2.Ng5 b6 3.Rh3 Qh8 4.Rf1 Qg7 5.Qxg7+ Rxg7 6.b4 axb3 7.axb3
>  =  (0.06)   Depth: 17/57   01:15:06  4026168kN
>1.Qe3!
>  =  (0.09)   Depth: 17/57   01:20:51  4352210kN
>1.Qe3 e4 2.Qc3 Qxc3 3.Rxc3 Ra6 4.b4 axb3 5.axb3 Ra3 6.f3 exf3 7.Nxf3 f4
>  =  (0.13)   Depth: 17/57   01:23:43  4515363kN
>I unfortunatly look at some of these possitions and just wonder what Deep Blue
>would have done?:(

If the search doesn't get blown up, singular extensions will help here.
Personnally I think it will blow up.

Tony




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.