Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 01:37:45 01/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2003 at 03:16:48, Jorge Pichard wrote: >In this critical position where Kasparov mentioned that the mistake was probably >21.b4? We should pit different programs of similar strength such as: >Shredder 7 vs Deep Junior, Deep Frit7 vs Deep Junior and altenate white and >black for each program. Allow each program to finish the game by using a time >control of 6 Minutes per move. Also Take the position from move 25....f4 26.h3 >and do the same. It is preferable to do this test only if you have a computer >equal = or greater > than 2.0 Ghz and preferably a Dual either an AMD MP or a >Dual Intel Xeon. Please provide your result ASAP. > >[D]2b2rk1/rp5p/3p1qpQ/2nPpp2/p1P5/R7/PPBN1PPP/4R1K1 w - - avoid 21.b4? I find such tests pretty useless, to be honest. If the computers don't understand how to play a certain position, what exactly do you want to conclude from the results of this computer-experiment? It's like playing a comp-comp tournament after the moves "d4 d5" and drawing conclusions about how well they play the queenspawn-gambit. ;) [how however that is called exactly] Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.