Author: maria clara benedicto
Date: 03:30:05 01/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2003 at 04:35:57, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 30, 2003 at 03:45:54, Dana Turnmire wrote: > >>On January 30, 2003 at 02:48:38, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On January 30, 2003 at 02:37:47, Dana Turnmire wrote: >>> >>>>On January 29, 2003 at 19:39:38, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >>>>> >Genius is weak only relative to the top commercial programs so if you play >against another thing or if the opponent does not give machines hours to >calculate you have good chances to win. > >My experience is that most of the correspondence players do not use programs for >hours. > >Today I have 6 games as 6th board in the olimpiad. > >all of my games are in the opening stage but I already decided to start to give >programs to analyze positions for hours in 2 of the games that my opponents >sacrificed a pawn and I also started to collect information about games(I did >not buy a special database but thanks to chessbase it is possible to search for >games with a specific position and I can get games including a lot of >correspondence games). > >I did not do it in the first moves but now I start to do it inspite of the fact >that the position is still theory with a lot of games. > >Uri no wonder i lost some email chessgames. they must have been using chess programs! i thought we couldnt use chess engines to play for us. i only use chessbaselight to check openings. and go through my own opening researches done with winboard engines. regards maria
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.