Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Ed's "indirect addressing"

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 05:30:51 01/30/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 30, 2003 at 02:00:57, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On January 30, 2003 at 01:34:19, Russell Reagan wrote:
>
>>On January 30, 2003 at 00:05:35, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>Try the following with your compiler inside of your profiler:
>>
>>With MSVC 6 Pro...
>>
>>        Func          Func+Child           Hit
>>        Time   %         Time      %      Count  Function
>>---------------------------------------------------------
>>    3819.452  34.0     3819.452  34.0  1000000 _swi (test.obj)
>>    3718.852  33.1     3718.852  33.1  1000000 _poi (test.obj)
>>    3710.973  33.0     3710.973  33.0  1000000 _arr (test.obj)
>>       0.000   0.0    11213.196  99.7        1 _main (test.obj)
>
>Interesting.  MS VC++ usually has huge differences for the different methods.
>
>What optimization settings did you use?

I set the active configuration to Release, and enabled profiling. When I compile
for Pentium Pro, I get:

        Func          Func+Child           Hit
        Time   %         Time      %      Count  Function
---------------------------------------------------------
    3806.877  33.9     3806.877  33.9  1000000 _swi (test.obj)
    3714.811  33.1     3714.811  33.1  1000000 _poi (test.obj)
    3702.155  33.0     3702.155  33.0  1000000 _arr (test.obj)
       0.000   0.0    11217.521  99.9        1 _main (test.obj)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.