Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Ed's "indirect addressing"

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 05:42:07 01/30/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 30, 2003 at 04:55:09, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>This speed stuff is worth thinking about, but it's way more important to think
>about move ordering, pruning, extensions, and good eval.

I agree. I had a little brain fart when thinking about it. I remembered Ed
saying "one instruction" and recalled it as saying "one cycle", and then I went
crazy thinking about the possibilities of generating moves at a rate of 1 move
per handful of cycles using a series of jump tables to jump tables. Then I
realized this must be too good to be true. But yes I agree with you, it's not
really important.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.