Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 17:50:37 01/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2003 at 20:28:37, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 30, 2003 at 19:57:34, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On January 30, 2003 at 19:48:10, Rodney Topor wrote: >> >>>On January 30, 2003 at 19:43:51, Arshad Syed wrote: >>> >>>>After Game 1, I was very dissapointed about Junior. I didn't really think Junior >>>>would come back to win. Fantastic performance by DF. Hope to see one more such >>>>win, only without a Kasparov error. So far, all the games lost by DF and DJ have >>>>been mainly due to blunders on Kramnik's or Kasparov's part. Looking forward to >>>>see DJ break this trend. >>> >>>Do you meain to claim that all the games _won_ by DF and DJ have been mainly due >>>to blunders by Kramnik or Kasparov? Do others agree? >>> >>>Rodney >> >>I think that is most often the case. i.e. a clear proven blunder. But there >>might be better players against computers than Kasparov or Kramnik. >> It might well be that their extra few hundred ELO points don't make all that >>much difference against computers, compared to another person who is very >>special in anti-computer playing. Isn't Mr. Nemeth only about 2100 ELO, and >>maybe equal to Kasparov or Kramnik against computers? >>S.Taylor > >No > >I do not believe that Nemeth can score even 1.5/6 against Junior in the >condition that kasparov is playing. > >Uri Nobody here seems to like logic. Uri,how could youknow? How can you say conditions?Why should Eduard be in Kasparovs conditions?? And to the others above: You conclude that others are better than the actually best players.This is nonsense. These two are not the best for psychological reasons but for their deep insights. The point is this. They simply are not used to play compsand it also makes no sense for them. Money in such shows alone can't make them students again. Since both however are fantastic calculators too I make the only possible conclusion. They simply help theprogs to look good. Period. If you ask but why? then I say because they got million $$ for nothing. This is corrupting. Eduard would not be much better in front of a big crowd because he's used to. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.