Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:17:27 01/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2003 at 19:28:37, Matt Taylor wrote: >On January 29, 2003 at 10:06:04, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: > >>Dr. Nikolski, >> >>Nehalem is obviously a 64 bit microprocessor using electron-etched circuitry. >>Does this mean that it won't run MChess Pro ver. 8? or WChess or Chess Genius >>or......? >> >>Two years to go...for a processor that will run chess programs at 5 to 8 times >>the current speed. Do you know how much these things will cost and how much >>power they will suck up? >> >>Tim >> >>On January 29, 2003 at 07:16:49, Yar wrote: >> >>>Intel is going to create a 10,20Ghz processor in 2005 >>>http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=7481 >>> >>>Yar > >Nehalem -might- be 64-bit. That article gives no indication. Given that Intel >already has a 64-bit processor in the works (Yamhill), I would wager no. Nehalem >is a descendant of Prescott, not Yamhill. > >5-8? I think you mean 2-3 times as fast. Current top-of-the-line is the P4 3.06 >GHz, and the vibe I have been getting from Intel over the past several years is >that they're moving -away- from more work per clock on the desktop, so future >processors may be less efficient per clock. > >Wattage is harder to guess, but I would assume that it will be nearing 110-120 W >by then. > >They will cost just as much as Intel chips always have. I remember a time when >the high-end original Pentiums cost $500 per chip. Lo and behold, the P4 3.06 >GHz currently costs almost $700. With that in mind, it is easy to predict what >future processors will cost. > >-Matt That's pure chickenfeed. :) check out the price of the xeon processors with 2M L2 cache. $4000 each, roughly. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.