Author: Derek Winter
Date: 22:24:33 01/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
The implication of this is that one should be trying Fritz 8 with smaller hash tables, e.g., if you have 800 MB available, try 196 MB, not 640 MB. On January 28, 2003 at 16:39:17, Antonio Palma wrote: >Is a fresh installation and actually i am working to set a dual boot machine >(win 98 and xp) so i can have some fixed parameters (hardware). > >About the PC, i mentioned the Athlon 1 GHz CPU is by AMD with asus mobo and 700 >Mb Ram. >Friends of mine tested the following hardware in win 98 > > HASH kn/s FRITZMARK >Pentium3 400 MHz 144MB 199 284 >AMD 700 MHz 192MB 370 514 >AMD 1400 MHz 68MB 763 1.104 >AMD 1400 MHz 163MB 740 1.040 >AMD 1400 MHz 192MB 716 1.008 > >My preliminary results with Athlon 100 in winxp were: > >AMD 1000 MHz 192MB 287 400 > >incredibly less than a 700 MHz. > >So I decided to use fixed hardware (mine) to chech any differences in OS. >Appreciate any comment about these preliminary results. > > > > >On January 28, 2003 at 07:48:40, pavel wrote: > >> >>Or it could be that since you "upgraded" over previous installation over an old >>operating system, instead of doing a "fresh" installation, is the reason. >> >>Fresh installation are ussually optimum installation IMO. >> >>By the way, you didn't mention which processor you are using, (ie, PIV), >>comparing two differant type of computers is a mistake. >> >>If he is using AMD and you are using PIV, chances are his one is faster, >>regardless of what operating system and kind of installation you did. >> >> >> >>Cheers, >>pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.